Big Ideas: On graphics
There is a not-insignificant portion of humans on this planet who love controversy. They love to argue, love to take the contrary position, love to complain. Frequently found on game forums, this breed enjoys nothing more than to explain to anyone who will bother to read them how the latest iteration of their beloved franchise has destroyed the game, and how much better version x was compared with version y.
Sometimes there is even a kernel of truth to their ire, as in games like World of Warcraft, where the developers are constantly updating the game with bug fixes and game balance patches. The word "nerf" is typically heard, and stories of the good old days abound. Functional changes I understand. But occasionally a different sort of complaint is heard, and it's this type of whingeing that puzzles me. How seriously can I take arguments that revolve around a game's graphics?
Sometimes there is even a kernel of truth to their ire, as in games like World of Warcraft, where the developers are constantly updating the game with bug fixes and game balance patches. The word "nerf" is typically heard, and stories of the good old days abound. Functional changes I understand. But occasionally a different sort of complaint is heard, and it's this type of whingeing that puzzles me. How seriously can I take arguments that revolve around a game's graphics?




