The
recent post on the
National Institute on Media and the Family by our own
John Callaham brought to mind this well-trod subject. Let's lay out the particulars. Video games sometimes feature violent and/or sexual content. Children who are too young to access such material should be prevented from doing so. The
Entertainment Software Ratings Board exists to assess the content of video games and provide a label for parents to use in determining which games are safe for their children to play. However, the NIMF has been at odds with the ESRB for years, claiming that they're either not doing their job properly, or that their system isn't enough of a deterrent to prevent the sale of non-kid friendly games from being sold to minors.
This begs the question: when it comes to the safety of children, who's responsible? The parents, or society? Can any organization, well-meaning though it might be, have a reasonable expectation of adherence to its own standards? Shouldn't it be up to the parents alone to determine what's okay for their kids to experience? Do children really need protecting?