No dedicated servers for Rage multiplayer?
The specific reasons for such a move are not really spelled out in the brief article, stating that Carmack felt "the servers are something of a remnant of the early days of PC gaming." However he hasn't closed the door to such a move saying, "We'll see how it works out for everyone else." At the moment Rage won't likely be out until sometime in 2010.
Recent Posts
- Maxim's Hometown Hotties show their support for Blur (11/21/2009)
- Stardock CEO talks more about PC game digital downloads (11/21/2009)
- Blizzard: Diablo III "is not going to be out next year" (11/21/2009)
- Reminder: Left 4 Dead 2 giveaway underway (11/21/2009)
- VGA teaser trailer now revealed in full; could it be a Spec Ops revival? (11/21/2009)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Why not give the option to allow players to not use dedicated servers, but also implement the stuff to also have dedicated servers? Let basic users have peer hosted games, and clans/dedicated groups have a server if they want.Posted at 1:51AM on Nov 6th 2009 by Nick
This new direction developers are taking by forgoing dedicated server support seems to be a way of stopping online piracy. Or, it's just cheaper to drop it all together and push out the product faster.Posted at 7:12AM on Nov 6th 2009 by Terry




To be fair, in this instance we don't know how multiplayer will work in Rage. If it's like Borderlands (4 player coop) sure. If it's a standard 12v12 deathmatch style game, forget it.Posted at 1:43AM on Nov 6th 2009 by Kevin